Thursday, November 18, 2010

An Introduction of the Psalms

Starting this Sunday, as we prepare for Advent, we are turning our sermon series towards the Psalms. David wrote a great number of the Psalms, and during Advent, we are going to study "The Gospel According to David"...below, in preparation, is a primer for how to read David's writings.

An Introduction to the Psalms for Canon Press - written by Bono of U2

Explaining belief has always been difficult. How do you explain a love and logic at the heart of the universe when the world is so out of kilter with this? Has free will got us crucified? And what about the dodgy characters who inhabit the tome known as the Bible, who hear the voice of God? Explaining faith is impossible: vision over visibility; instinct over intellect. A songwriter plays a chord with the faith that he will hear the next one in his head.

One of the writers of the psalms was a musician, a harp-player whose talents were required at "the palace" as the only medicine that would still the demons of the moody and insecure King Saul of Israel. It is a thought that still inspires: Marilyn sang for Kennedy, the Spice Girls for Prince Charles.

At the age of 12, I was a fan of David. He felt familiar, like a pop star could feel familiar. The words of the psalms were as poetic as they were religious, and he was a star. Before David could fulfil the prophecy and become the king of Israel, he had to take quite a beating. He was forced into exile and ended up in a cave in some no-name border town facing the collapse of his ego and abandonment by God. But this is where the soap opera got interesting. This is where David was said to have composed his first psalm -- a blues. That's what a lot of the psalms feel like to me, the blues. Man shouting at God -- "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? Why art thou so far from helping me?" (Psalm 22).

I hear echoes of this holy row when un-holy bluesman Robert Johnson howls, "There's a hellhound on my trail" or Van Morrison sings, "Sometimes, I feel like a motherless child." Texas Alexander mimics the psalms in "Justice Blues": "I cried Lord my father, Lord kingdom come. Send me back my woman, then thy will be done." Humorous, sometimes blasphemous, the blues was backslidin' music but, by its very opposition, it flattered the subject of its perfect cousin, gospel.

Abandonment and displacement are the stuff of my favourite psalms. The Psalter may be a font of gospel music, but for me it's despair that the psalmist really reveals and the nature of his special relationship with God. Honesty, even to the point of anger. "How long, Lord? Wilt thou hide thyself forever?" (Psalm 89), or "Answer me when I call" (Psalm 5).

Psalms and hymns were my first taste of inspirational music. I liked the words, but I wasn't sure about the tunes -- with the exception of Psalm 23, "The Lord is my Shepherd." I remember them as droned and chanted rather than sung. But they prepared me for the honesty of John Lennon, the baroque language of Bob Dylan and Leonard Cohen, the open throat of Al Green and Stevie Wonder. When I hear these singers, I am reconnected to a part of me I have no explanation for -- my "soul" I guess.

Words and music did for me what solid, even rigorous, religious argument could never do -- they introduced me to God, not belief in God, more an experiential sense of GOD. Over art, literature, girls, my mates, the way in to my spirit was a combination of words and music. As a result, the Book of Psalms always felt open to me and led me to the poetry of Ecclesiastes, the Song of Solomon, the book of John...My religion could not be fiction, but it had to transcend facts. It could be mystical, but not mythical.

My mother was Protestant, my father Catholic. Anywhere other than Ireland that would be unremarkable. The "Prods" at that time had the better tunes and the Catholics had the better stage-gear. My mate Gavin Friday used to say: "Roman Catholicism is the Glamrock of religion" with its candles and psychedelic colours -- cardinal blues, scarlets and purples -- smoke bombs of incense and the ring of the little bell. The Prods were better at the bigger bells, they could afford them. In Ireland, wealth and Protestantism went together. To have either was to have collaborated with the enemy -- that is, Britain. This did not fly in our house.

After going to Mass at the top of the hill, in Finglas on the north side of Dublin, my father waited outside the little Church of Ireland chapel at the bottom of the hill, where my mother had brought her two sons.

I kept myself awake thinking of the clergyman's daughter and let my eyes dive into the cinema of the stained glass. These Christian artists had invented the movies. Light projected through colour to tell their story. In the Seventies the story was "the Troubles," and the Troubles came through the stained glass, with rocks thrown more in mischief than in anger. But the message was the same: the country was to be divided along sectarian lines. I had a foot in both camps, so my Goliath became religion itself: I began to see religion as the perversion of faith. I began to see God everywhere else. In girls, fun, music, justice and still -- despite the lofty King James translation -- the Scriptures.

I loved these stories for the basest reasons. These were action movies, with some hardcore men and women, the car chases, the casualties, the blood and guts. There was very little kissing.

David was a star, the Elvis of the Bible, if we can believe the chiselling of Michelangelo. And unusually for such a "rock star," with his lust for power, lust for women, lust for life, he had the humility of one who knew his gift worked harder than he ever would. He even danced naked in front of his troops -- the biblical equivalent of the royal walkabout. David was definitely more performance artist than politician.

Anyway, I stopped going to churches and got into a different kind of religion. Don't laugh. That's what being in a rock 'n' roll band is. Showbiz is shamanism, music is worship. Whether it's worship of women or their designer, the world or its destroyer, whether it comes from that ancient place we call soul or simply the spinal cortex, whether the prayers are on fire with a dumb rage or dove-like desire, the smoke goes upwards, to God or something you replace God with -- usually yourself.

Years ago, lost for words and with 40 minutes of recording time left before the end of our studio time, we were still looking for a song to close our third album, War. We wanted to put something explicitly spiritual on the record to balance the politics and romance of it; like Bob Marley or Marvin Gaye would. We thought about the psalms -- Psalm 40. There was some squirming. We were a very "white" rock group, and such plundering of the scriptures was taboo for a white rock group unless it was in the "service of Satan." Psalm 40 is interesting in that it suggests a time in which grace will replace karma, and love will replace the very strict laws of Moses (in other words, fulfil them). I love that thought. David, who committed some of the most selfish as well as selfless acts, was depending on it. That the scriptures are brim full of hustlers, murderers, cowards, adulterers and mercenaries used to shock me. Now it is a source of great comfort.

"40" became the closing song at U2 shows, and on hundreds of occasions, literally hundreds of thousands of people of every size and shape of T-shirt have shouted back the refrain, pinched from Psalm 6: "How long (to sing this song)." I had thought of it as a nagging question, pulling at the hem of an invisible deity whose presence we glimpse only when we act in love. How long hunger? How long hatred? How long until creation grows up and the chaos of its precocious, hell-bent adolescence has been discarded? I thought it odd that the vocalising of such questions could bring such comfort -- to me, too.

But to get back to David, it is not clear how many of these psalms David or his son Solomon really wrote. Some scholars suggest that the royals never dampened their nibs and that there was a host of Holy Ghost writers. Who cares? I didn't buy Leiber and Stoller -- they were just his songwriters. I bought Elvis.


The Book of Psalms, with this introduction by Bono is published by
Canongate as part of a new series of pocket canons.

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Halloween: A CHRISTIAN Holiday?

Want to discuss a controversial subject? How about Halloween! How should Christians approach a pagan holiday? Should we view it as neutral...as something to avoid...something harmless...something to stand up against? Modern Christians have taken each and everyone of these positions...but which one is right? Is there a "right" view on Halloween? Before I dig into the subject, let me give you my personal experience...

I grew up going "trick or treating". I loved it! The candy...the ghosts and goblins...getting scared...and so on. The more I got educated in a typical 1980s fundamentalist faith, I was exposed to the satanic cultish underpinnings of the holiday. I was, frankly, confused. My gut told me it was wrong, but my childhood memories were so positive. This became especially important when our children were born and Lauren and I tried to determine their participation. Fall festivals were options. Does "trick or treating" mean you have gone to the dark side?? We weren't sure.

One unexpected bonus to fleshing out the proper view on Halloween came in seminary. As the leaves turned in St. Louis in the fall of 2001, I sat back and waited to see what the seminary offered in place of the devil's night. Much to my surprise, the seminary encouraged on-campus trick or treating for the children!! In fact, our president's children participated! That was actually the last thing I thought would happen...and it caused me to ask a few questions. I was led to some interesting answers. I will never try to push a view on this controversy on anyone. What you decide for your children is your call. So, what I want to do is give you the background to make a good decision...and open the lines of discussion!

So...how did this holiday start? There are multiple streams of traditions that emerged over the centuries. There are hints of a Roman festival centuries ago. Probably the most prominent is a Celtic festival marking the transition of daylight and night (transition of summer to winter in terms of the sun's rotation). They believed that time allowed spirits to also emerge as the "darker half" of the year started. This Celtic festival started the tradition of carving turnips into funny or scary faces to scare off the spirits...yes, turnips! It was in America in the 1900s that pumpkins were used. They were easier to carve, obviously...but also a symbol of a good harvest.

The most prominent festival and celebration, though, is CHRISTIAN. The idea of trick or treating goes back to the 1500s practice of "souling" in Ireland and England (although there is evidence around that time in other areas of Europe), where the poor would door to door in advance of the CHRISTIAN holiday "All Saints Day." Dressing up in costumes were to impress or amuse the people they met going door to door...and to mock or fight off any evil spirits. This tradition came over to America and evolved into children becoming the focus only in the early to mid 1900s. Trick or treating, as we know it, is less than 100 years old!

The word "Halloween" is not an evil word. In fact, it is simply a contraction for "All Hallow's Eve". The word "hallow" means saint or holy. "All Saints Day" is still celebrated today every November 1. It is the celebration of the victory of the saints by their union with Christ! All Saints Day is a holiday that goes back over 1,000 years! It celebrates Scriptures like Ephesians 6 and Romans 16:20, where we are assured of our victory over Satan and evil spirits...as well as our own sin, by our union in Christ. All Saints Day works off the premise that although Jesus has finished HIS work, we are involved in the mop-up operations...battles are still ongoing.

Just as we truly begin celebrating Christmas on Christmas Eve, the celebration for All Saints Day began on October 31 - All Hallow's Eve. Here was the concept - on October 31, the evil forces try one last time to achieve victory, but is defeated by the people of God. How do we win that victory? MOCKERY!! Satan's (and ours) greatest sin is pride. So, their method of attack was to ridicule him! Satan was portrayed as dressed up in a red suit with horns and a tail to MOCK HIM! They made evil look ridiculous. This is the ancient way of taunting. We have Jesus, yes we do, we have Jesus...how about you?

Ever wonder why Martin Luther picked October 31 to post his 95 theses to start the Reformation? It wasn't a coincidence! Halloween IS all about evil and demons...it is all about their DEFEAT! Centuries ago, children would dress up like ghosts and goblins and vampires to MOCK the spirits that might think they can defeat the forces of Christ. Halloween is about having NO FEAR of things that are scary. Psalm 2 says that the One enthroned in heaven laughs (at His enemies)...He mocks them.

We as believers often lament how Christmas and Easter have been taken from us and commercialized. We fight to redeem those holidays...but no one fights for Halloween! No holiday has been ripped from our calendar like Halloween. We as Christians avoid it. We call October 31 "Reformation Day" to honor Luther. What would Martin Luther think about that??I think he might start another Reformation! His note might say "what happened to Halloween?"

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Problems with Scripture

Ever forced into doing something? Ever say, "I'll do it, but I don't like it!" Ever have a problem with the truth? Well, if you ever wanted to know which chapter of the Bible might make you feel this way, then look no further than 1 Samuel 15. This is a long chapter. It is a critical chapter in terms of the narrative leading to Saul's ultimate demise and David's ultimate rise. But, quite possibly, the thing that makes this chapter most significant is the controversial moral and theological texts that show up throughout the chapter.

In this blog, I will attempt to help with one of these. In our sermon on Sunday, I will attempt to deal with some of the others. The issue I want to tackle in this chapter is one I might regret by the time I finish. The first 10 verses detail another situation where Saul does not fully obey God's commandment. And, in verse 11, God says to Samuel that He regrets making Saul king...it could be translated another way...God is sorry...or another...God is repenting. This statement is one that pastors often like skirting past. Can God make a mistake? Can God really regret a decision He made? Tough questions to think about.

Samuel doesn't accept God's thoughts. The Scripture says that he was angry and cried out to God all night long. As the story goes along, we run into another nugget in verse 29. It says that "the Glory of Israel will not lie or repent; for He is not a man, that He should repent. Ok...so God repented, regretted, was sorry...and now He can't be any of those things. I am pretty sure that I regret tackling this subject, but what about God? Just to make things more complicated, when the story is over, at the end of the chapter, we see AGAIN that God regrets making Saul king. Maybe the narrator of the story is regretting that he mentioned God WASN'T sorry and repented on his earlier statement? Not likely.

This chapter is really tough for Presbyterians! We believe in a sovereign God who has predestined everything that happens. This kind of hurts our assertions. The Hebrew word is naham. It actually occurs nearly 30 times in the Old Testament. Dale Ralph Davis, a great OT theologian, points out that when used, naham never loses its emotional element. You can see it in its first use:
"The LORD was grieved (naham) that He had made man on the earth, and His heart was filled with pain." - Genesis 6:6.
Davis also makes a very interesting point. Often times we try to dismiss these kind of verses by either minimizing its impact (skimming past it with nary a mention) or just claim it as an anthropomorphic reference. That is when the Bible describes God using human characteristics (i.e. the "hand" of God or God "saw" something). Obviously, God is a Spirit and has no body, but Biblical writers will reference God's hand or back or whatever to describe what was going on. Man regrets...God regrets...unfortunately, that explanation just doesn't happen here.

So, how should we approach this issue? The Genesis 6 verse actually sheds some light. Let's, for a moment, focus on the reason for the regret rather than the regret. Why does God regret/feel sorry? The previous verse (Genesis 6:5) says that man intention was on evil continually. Man's sin causes God's regret and pain. Here, in 1 Samuel, the full verse says: "I am sorry that I made Saul king, because he has turned back from following Me." Interesting...before, it was all of man's sin. Here, it is one man's sin. But, in both cases, sin is the catalyst. The Westminster Confession states (2.1) that God is without passions. Davis, who supports the Confession, says that might be true, but it doesn't mean God is devoid of feelings. In other words, God is surprised by the sin of many or the failure of one...but it doesn't mean that our sin has no impact on Him. The story tells us that Samuel mourned and God repented. It is possible that the best explanation of God's repenting is the expression of God's attitude towards sin against Him.

When Samuel tells Saul that God DOESN'T repent, this apparent contradiction isn't really one at all. What Samuel is saying is that God made a decision to take the kingdom away from Saul, and on that, He will NOT change His mind. So, at this point, God regrets making Saul king, and He won't repent from the decision to remove him. This isn't a threat. It is real. So, we are left with a plausible, but maybe not satisfying explanation. But we can rest in this. Our God has serious reactions to our sin. It pains Him. He is not indifferent to our rebellion. Davis says: He has both feelings and firmness. In the end, this chapter reveals God's consistency towards Saul...and therefore, towards us. The sermon will try to tackle some of the other issues of this amazing chapter.

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Repeat after me...

Something jumps out at you when you read from our sermon passage last week (1 Samuel 10) to our sermon passage for this week (1 Samuel 13)...and even into our passage for next week (1 Samuel 15). Reminders! Yes, we pointed out several reminders in our sermon last Sunday. God reminding His people of what He has done for them. God reminding His people how they have treated Him. And, God warning His people what will happen when they repeat their past sins again.

Part of this reminder process is actually a result of the Hebrew language. It was quite repetitive. You might notice this when you read through most any Old Testament narrative. You will see texts like this:
So, the Lord spoke through His servant Moses to the people: "Thus says the Lord..."
The writer says the Lord is speaking...and then Moses says the Lord is speaking. Twice, you are REMINDED that the Lord is speaking! In other places, you will see someone says something is going to happen (like Samuel in 1 Samuel 10)...then you will get the story on what actually happened. You could have 2 chapters cover something that, if you were trying to be brief, might only take 10-15 verses. This is just how the Hebrews spoke and wrote. Remember that most couldn't read, so stories were memorized and shared. Repeating things were good memory tools.

So, what does this have to do with our series on David? Well, we should expect things to be repeated just by the nature of the language we are translating from. But, when things get repeated over and over and over again...then maybe the writer, and the inspirer behind the writing (GOD!), is trying to get a message into our thick skulls.

These repeat messages show up a lot in the context of our passage this Sunday (1 Samuel 13). If you start back at 1 Samuel 8 and go up through chapter 14. This Sunday we are going to attempt to summarize what goes on in these 5-6 chapters. In order to give you a window into what I am talking about, I want to take one chapter and see the reminders. Let's look at 1 Samuel 12:

This chapter is basically a farewell speech or address from Samuel to Israel. Saul has been identified and accepted as King and Samuel, it appears, is attempting to retire from public life. Remember last Sunday I mentioned how God had spoken several times about He had redeemed Israel from Egypt and protected them and given them the Promised Land? Samuel, after a few opening remarks, says that AGAIN in verses 7-9. He then recounts the many rejections of Israel of God and many redemptions of God for Israel, again...things God has already said before. In verse 12-13, God reminds (again!!) the people about how their decision to ask for a king was a rejection of God as their king.

Then, after all the reminders of things God has already reminded them of...we move on to something different. This is verse 14:
"If you will fear the Lord and serve Him and obey His voice and not rebel against the commandment of the Lord, and if both you and the king who reigns over you will FOLLOW the Lord your God, it will be well."
Israel kind of gets a clean slate! After all the reminders, they have received a slap of grace right across the face. In the next verse, God issues a warning that if they DON'T serve/obey/follow, then the Lord's hand will be against them. So, new king, new season, new opportunity. Of course, I like the concept of FOLLOWING!

Then something interesting happens. First, God gets their attention over their sin with a thunder and lightning show. Next, the people REPENT! Grace first, then the people respond. Finally, after all that...the really interesting part: REMINDERS!!! It is really crazy, but God, does it again! Verse 20: "Yet do not turn aside from FOLLOWING THE LORD, but serve the Lord with all your HEART." He then reminds us of God's great love for His people. Then...AGAIN...another REMINDER!! Verse 24: "Only fear the Lord and serve Him faithfully with all your heart...consider what great things He has done for you...but if you do wickedly, you shall be swept away, both you and your king."

So, what do we do with this? There are many applications here. One obvious one is that if God says it once, then pay attention...if He says it 5 times, REALLY PAY ATTENTION! We can do better than that, though, can't we? Here is what I want you to get from this:

The life of a believer is simple (not saying its easy, just simple). Love God. Serve Him. Follow Him. We see so much pain and suffering in the Scriptures...and God always brings it back to the simple truth: you chased after other gods and other things and rejected Me. Just love the Lord Your God with all your heart, soul, mind, etc. That is the summary of the 10 commandments, right? Love God and love others. That is the message of Christ, right? Love God, love others, follow Me. It shows up everywhere in the Scriptures...several times right here hidden in the middle of Samuel: fear God, serve Him, obey...follow Him.

When your life is packed with clutter (we all have it!)...simplify. Our lives as believers is simply about following Jesus. Focusing on that one thing will enlighten us to handle the 1,000 other things thrown our way. Think about it: Israel had a new king, many enemies, a valuable piece of land, a weapon shortage, hundreds of thousands of people, and a history of sin and suffering. Lots on their plate. God's advice? Samuel's advice? Just love God, obey, and follow. Simple.

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

When Saul meets Samuel

Last time we were in 1 Samuel in church, the people of Israel demanded a king. Samuel was too old and his sons were too dishonest. God wasn't happy with their desire to be "like the nations" but He commanded Samuel to grant their wish. In 1 Samuel 8, Samuel warns Israel what life will be like having a king. But, as the chapter ends, they demand a king...and they will get one. But who? The next story introduces us to a man named Saul, the son of Kish...a Benjamite.

Chapter 9 has Saul embark on what appears to be an uneventful journey. Kish has lost his donkeys and sends Saul out to find them. They look everywhere! They looked in the hill country, the land of Shalishah and Shaalim and Benjamin and Zuph. Eventually, Saul wonders if they should return before Kish starts worrying about them being lost even more than the donkeys. But Saul's servant encourages him to go see the prophet in Zuph...who just so happens to be Samuel.

Before Saul arrives, the Scripture tells us that God told Samuel to look for a man from Benjamin and to anoint him as king over Israel. Lost donkeys leads to a found prince! Samuel tells Saul to stay with him overnight, and eases his mind, saying, "as for your donkeys...do not set your mind on them, for they have been found."

Now, we must backtrack to the very beginning of chapter 9...Saul was an impressive figure. He was more handsome than any man in Israel...and he was a head taller than anyone. But here, as Samuel heaps praise on Saul and treats him like royalty, we see Saul's internal view of himself. To Saul, he isn't handsome (probably doesn't have a mirror!)...To Saul, he isn't a giant. He says to Samuel, "aren't I from the smallest/weakest tribe of Israel? And my clan of Benjamin, aren't we the weakest clan from the weakest tribe?"

After a meal and special treatment after special treatment...Samuel gets some "alone time" with Saul. He anoints him as king, and gives him a sign that this is true and from God. He tells Saul all that will happen next. And everything that Samuel tells him comes to pass. Saul eventually meets up with his uncle and his uncle asks him what Samuel told him. Saul says that Samuel said the donkeys were found, but doesn't say anything about being king.

At one point, the Scriptures tells us that when Saul left Samuel, God gave him another heart...Samuel also told Saul that "the Spirit of the Lord will rush upon you" - and that takes us straight to the theme of our series: "After the heart of God" - the BIG QUESTION we need to think about is the heart of Saul. What does the heart of Saul look like? Is it a heart after the heart of God? This Sunday, we will pick up the story in 1 Samuel 10. At this point, Saul's heart has been changed, but the kingdom is not his yet. The story gets quite complicated from this point on...

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

A Reason for a King

On Sunday we started our series on David by covering the passage where we first meet David, 1 Samuel 16. But that is not the beginning of the story. This week we are going to retreat to 1 Samuel 8 and discuss how and why Israel became a kingdom in the first place. In this blog entry, we are going to go even further back, all the way to Deuteronomy.

This coming Sunday, we are going to discuss why Israel's decision to have a king is a bad idea. But, if Israel's heart was in the right place, having a king was permissible. In Deuteronomy 17:14, it says, "When you come to the land that the LORD your God is giving you, and you possess it and dwell in it, and then say, 'I will set a king over me, like all the nations that are around me,' you may indeed set a king over you whom the LORD your God will choose." With that, God lays out some regulations on how the king needs to operate. Some things that seem trivial (not returning to Egypt to acquire horses) and some things very telling (the king should not have many wives and should read and follow the law).

A good question as we approach 1 Samuel 8 is this: why would God be upset at Israel's desire to have a king when He has given them that provision already in the Scriptures? The answer isn't easy, but, as with everything we will look at in the David storyline, it starts with the heart. God is looking at the hearts of His people. He is looking at their motivations. Even though something is permissible, it doesn't always mean it is good (see 1 Corinthians 8-10 to see how we should view things in our lives that God has given us to enjoy, yet with discernment).

Insight to figuring out what was going on in the hearts of Israel comes in reading Joshua and Judges. I will highlight some of it this coming Sunday, but it is fair to say that God would allow a king under certain conditions. If you read through Joshua and Judges, those conditions were never met. Think of a child turning 16 and as a parent, you are considering whether to purchase them a car. You start laying out a plan when they turn 14...save "x" amount of money, practice driving in the parking lot twice a week, make good grades, find a summer job, etc. If your child turns 16 and hasn't met even one condition, should they receive a car?

The answer is no. But Israel wasn't 16 anymore. They had grown up. Under God's provision, a king was an option. Instead of being a blessing, God sees a king as potentially being judgment on them. Again, it goes back to their hearts. The only chance for the hearts of Israel is the heart of God. As a loving parent, God is patient and protective. But God also allows Israel to live in their sin and rebellion...and face the consequences. Joshua and Judges are a downward spiral that reaches ugly depths. But the heart of God uses even the sins of His people to accomplish His redemptive purposes. A king is in His ultimate plan for Israel and for us. No matter how it happens, God will use it for His glory.

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Back in the Saddle??

Well...it has been a little while since I last posted. I wrote about going on vacation in my last post. From the looks of it, I was gone for 3 months! Sorry about that. I am not a writer by nature and I have found it hard to build "blogging" into my weekly schedule. So, I need your help to keep me accountable to write.

Why come back? Well, we are about to start a sermon series on David. It is something I am very excited about. There is so much we can learn from the life of David. This Sunday, I will begin the process of WHY we should study David and what lessons we should be looking for as we go through this series. Each week I will try and fill in the gaps of the story that I don't focus on in my sermons, as well as reflect on any questions or comments you might bring to me.

So...you ready? See you Sunday!